The “New Dawn” must deliver on vital projects in community development
President Cyril Ramaphosa declared
a new era of hope, “ New Dawn” for the country pledging to tackle corruption, unemployment
and inequality.
![]() |
President Cyril Ramaphosa |
The New Development Bank has
committed R19.86bn towards South Africa’s development projects as it launched
its regional office in Sandton, Johannesburg in 2017.
A number of national and
international companies made major investment announcements during President
Cyril Ramaphosa's Investment Conference in October 2018 that was called to
rally investors to plough money into the country’s ailing economy. A total of
R134-billion was pledged with the aim of reviving the country’s economy.
The government has developed the
National Development Plan (NDP) and has embarked on an infrastructure
development drive with the allocation of much needed financial resources for its
implementation.
To encourage an even spread of
infrastructure development to tackle, not only backlogs on economic growth, but
poverty alleviation as a whole, a programme of focussed Spatial Development
Initiatives (SDI) was undertaken by government as reported by Treasury in 2000.
This programme is a short-term investment strategy that was aimed at unlocking
inherent economic potential in specific spatial locations in southern Africa. The
key issue in this regard is whether SDI projects was prioritized in terms of
their ability to create jobs.
There were four main SDI
objectives:
Export orientation and earning foreign exchange
- Sustainable job creation
- Better utilisation of existing infrastructure and resources
- Broadening the ownership base of the economy to small and medium entrepreneurs, farmers and fisher folk.
Understandably, Treasury would
have a market driven outlook focused on big scale contributions to the GDP, but
has the focus of government changed to meet the basic needs of our people?
Our country has examples of
long-standing spatial policies that was driven by narrow ideological objectives
that generated few enduring benefits. These policies and objectives ignored
economic principles and failed in contextualising the underlying social problems
or empathy of vulnerable communities. Many of the well-intended developmental
project initiatives were hampered by poor government coordination and vision, primarily
due to construction disasters, cost over-runs, and lack of project oversight.
Some of the project challenges
were:
•M1 Highway Footbridge: Collapse
of footbridge leaving two people dead. Two days before the incident it was
announced at a meeting that bolts were missing in the structure
•Gautrain:Cost: cost overruns –
Initial cost R7bn eventual cost was around R30.462bn.
•Medupi Power Station: Cost
overruns -R118.5bn to R160bn excluding interest during construction
•PRASA: New locomotives bought
from Spain at a cost of R600 million, were of the wrong height for safe travel
on SA’s rail network.
•Magaliesburg Secondary School in
Ga Mohale: lengthy project delays
•Dr Harry Surtie Hospital in
Upington: 11 year project delays, building costs escalated from R290 million to
R1.8 billion
In 2015, in a Business Day
article by Mark Allix , he stated that Consulting Engineers SA (Cesa ) said
" that the government must make hard economic decisions about SA's
infrastructure development or face possible further unrest over service
delivery "
Infrastructure development
programmes are essential, but some may be more vital than others.
The Mbashe Local Municipality in
the Eastern Cape is incredibly a rural area. It is claimed that there are no
toilets, no taps, no electricity and the only source of water is from a few
springs in the area. These springs are polluted by grazing animals and children
playing in the water. In many of our rural communities we have children
competing with cows for drinking water.
In Kgotlopong in the Limpopo province
water from the Kgotlopong River is used for domestic purposes, severely compromising
community health. Although no source of running water, which is intended for
human consumption, can be presumed to be free from pollution and a potential
risk to public health government must act to mitigate such risk. A significant
proportion of residents in rural communities in South Africa are exposed to
water-borne disease and their complications through drinking of water from
springs and rivers. These diseases include a variety of bacterial, as well as
fungal, viral and parasitic infections
Water is a basic need and access
to this resource is a basic right and may be more important for a rural
community than getting the roads fixed. The same can be said about sanitation
and electricity.
The National Development Plan is
a long-term process earmarked for conclusion in 2030. South Africa can achieve
more in the short term if government, business, labour and civil society reach
consensus on national priorities.
The development and application of
an effective stakeholder engagement strategy, that includes community
participation, is key, as it will allow community involvement in determining
the future of their own lives. The vulnerable
communities, will also be allowed to determine their own list of priorities.
In engaging with communities, their
priority needs must be determined and joint decision making should take centre
stage on how infrastructure development projects will best address their
needs.
Consideration of priorities
should be the attainment of basic rights as enshrined in the constitution. Addressing
the most basic human needs such as access to running water, adequate and decent
waste disposal and health risk-free sanitation, electricity and decent housing
must take first preference.
The bucket toilet system and
informal settlements should be declared a crime against humanity and earmarked for
eradication.
Constant community engagement is
important to keep communities abreast of developments and to allow them an
opportunity to provide their input on the expected impact of projects, site
allocation, job creation and opportunities for local SMME’s.
The government might determine
that projects need to be labour intensive, but one needs to ensure that quality
and standards should never be compromised.
Adequate training and skills development programme should be conducted
where labour is required.
It becomes important for
municipalities to ensure that these IDP’s are aligned to the NDP.
Any large-scale new development project
must be decided upon based on a municipality’s overall approach and vision for growth
in the locality and must not be adding a further access barrier or economic
stumbling block to the people’s advancement.
New housing, primary health care
facilities and schools must be in the same proximity and must be within reach
of economic activity like shopping centres, factories and other manufacturing
facilities.
New developments must contribute
to social cohesion and be surrounded by sports and recreation facilities to
instil a sense of community pride and ownership.
This will inevitably mean the
provision of a full basket of services to communities.
Let’s hope the “new dawn” we have
now entered in our country allows for consciousness to create a better life for
all.